Archive for the ‘Vs.’ Category

Morten vs. Football

Monday, June 28th, 2010

Not that I care, but the North American brutalization of the name of the sport whose World Cup is currently being played in South Africa is starting to get a bit annoying. So here’s a small language lesson:

Football is the name of the sport in which 22 players, 11 on each team, run mindlessly around on a huge field and try to kick a tiny ball into a huge net protected by a singular person with natural born fear of objects flying towards his or her face at enormous speed. The main point of the game is that apart from the keeper (often misnomered as the “goalie”) is the only person who is allowed to touch the ball with his or her hands. The rest of the players can only use their feet. Thereof the name “foot-ball”.

The sport played in the NFL and CFL is the one in which teams of 84 to 347 people play individually for approximately 2 minutes per game trying to move an air filled convex leather object from one end of the field to the other. The object, which in no way, shape or form resembles a ball, is most often either thrown or carried on the field. Only rarely is it kicked and then only when posed on top of a small plastic pedistal and held in place by a team mate. This last part is necessary because as the object is not a ball it cannot stand on the ground without assistance. The object of the game seems to be to look as much as possible like a cyborg and cause as much damage as possible to the opposing team as the players pile into, over or on top of the other players. Therefore the appropriate name for this sport should be “throw-object”, “carry-egg” or something similar.

According to Miriam Webster the definition of a “ball” is:

a round or roundish body or mass: as a : a spherical or ovoid body used in a game or sport <a tennis ball> —used figuratively in phrases like the ball is in your court to indicate who has the responsibility or opportunity for further action b : earth, globe c : a spherical or conical projectile; also : projectiles used in firearms d : a roundish protuberant anatomical structure (as near the tip of a human finger or toe or at the base of a thumb); especially : the part of the sole of the human foot between the toes and arch on which the main weight of the body rests in normal walking.

Clearly the object being tossed and carried around in Carry-egg does not in any way fit under the definition of “ball” and since the ball is only rarely kicked that part of the name is also a misnomer.

Thus I officially rename the “National Football League” and the “Canadian Football League” to “National Carry-egg League” or NCeL and “Canadian Carry-egg League” or CCeL. That way we can all ignore the FIFA World Cup without wondering why everyone is always talking about “sucker”s.

Morten vs. Sneakers Fashion

Monday, June 7th, 2010

image

Latest trend in sneakers design: The “oh shit I stepped on a tube of toothpaste” look.

Morten vs. Super Bored Cafe

Friday, May 21st, 2010

image

Well, at least you’re honest.

Morten vs. Pre Paid Cell Plans

Monday, April 12th, 2010

M: I’m looking for the cheapest pre-paid cell phone plan humanly possible for someone who hardly uses their phone

Phone Store Guy: The best deal available is this Rogers Anytime plan: You pay $10 for 25 minutes regarldess of when you call.

M: OK, and what happens if I don’t use all the 25 minutes in a month?

PSG: Then you need to top up your account with an additional $10 so your minutes don’t expire.

M: What?!?!?! So I have to pay even if I haven’t used up my minutes?

PSG: No, the minutes expire. You just need to top them up at the end of 30 days.

M: So you pay $10 a month then.

PSG: Yes.

M: So it’s not a pay-as-you-go plan. It’s a $10/month plan.

PSG: No, it’s pay-as-you-go.

M: But I have to pay $10/month.

PSG: Yes. Unless you top up with $100. Then your minutes last for a full year.

M: So your “pay-as-you-go” plan is actually either a “$10 per month” plan or a “$100 per year” plan.

PSG: No, it’s pay as you go.

M: And what if I have minutes left but it’s over 30 days since I last topped up?

PSG: Then your phone won’t work untill you top up $10.

M: So it’s a $10 per month plan.

PSG: No…bu..

M: Are all your misnamed “pay-as-you-go” plans scams like this one?

PSG: Yes, you have to top up all our plans. Same with our competitors.

M: I’m getting a walkie talkie.

Morten vs. the Dozen

Thursday, March 11th, 2010

Dozen according to GoogleI’ve noticed phrases like “a brawl involving more than two dozen Victoria-area teenagers” being used obsessively by North American news media. The article linked above is a perfect example: About three dozen words further down it actually spells out that the brawl included “about 30″ teenagers (so most likely either 29 or 31), so not 24 as the phrase above indicated. What’s weird is the journalists insist on using approximations and multiples of dozens rather than just spell out the actual number, even when they know what the actual number is. In one case I overheard a radio news report in which they first said that “just over 3 dozen people were injured” followed in the next sentence with “the 37 injured”.

Logically there can only be three possible explanations for this bizarre behaviour:

  1. A large percentage of the staff in North American news media suffer from Archaic Numerical Coprolalia.
  2. A large percentage of the staff in North American news media are secret agents for the Society of Creative Anacronism.
  3. A large percentage of the staff in North American news media are paid based on the number of letters used in their transcripts, and since the word “dozen” has a quarter dozen more letters in it than the number 12 they get paid more for using it.

I blame the baker’s for this linguistic anachronistic monstrosity.

Morten vs. The Eggplant

Thursday, March 4th, 2010

aubergineAt Save-on-Foods about 2 years ago:

M: Do you have any aubergines?

Produce Isle Guy: Heh?

M: You know… purple bulbous thing that’s white on the inside. Aubergine.

PIG: I have no idea what you’re talkin’ aboot.

M: Right…. I’ll just go look for it myself.

Morten finds an aubergine right behind the Produce Isle Guy.

M: Here. This is an aubergine. See, it even has an aubergine colour.

PIG: Ah, an eggplant.

M: It’s an aubergine.

PIG: No, it’s an eggplant.

M: The name “eggplant” stems from a different type of plant bulb that was white. This one is the colour aubergine, thus the name “aubergine”.

PIG: Really?

M: Yes. You should change the sign.

Morten vs. +Tax

Monday, March 1st, 2010

M: How much is it?

Cashier: $29.95

M: Really?

Cashier: Well…. plus tax you know.

M: So why did you say $29.95 then?

Cashier: That’s the price before tax.

M: So the actual price is $33.65. That’s the price that should be listed.

Cashier: No, the price is $29.95.

M: Seriously, what idiot came up with the idea of listing the price before tax when everyone has to pay the after tax price anyway. It’s bordering on false advertising.

Cashier: No, the price is $29.95.

M: But I still have to pay the tax on top. So why don’t you just list the actual price instead of tricking people with this “plus tax” nonsense.

Cashier: It’s because tax is the government’s way of stealing our money.

M: Seriously? Did you go to elementary school?

Cashier: Yes. What do you mean?

M: You went to school because people like your parents paid taxes. Same reason you got your shots at the doctor’s. Same reason there’s a cop outside. Same reason the fire department comes when your house catches fire.

Cashier: What does that have to do with anything?

M: The government doesn’t “steal” your money. They use it to pay for things like education. So by not paying attention in social sciences I’d say you stole your parent’s money. Or at least wasted it. We pay taxes so that society can function. And by putting the price before tax you and everyone who sells anything in this country is implying that taxes per definition is something evil imposed on them. It’s moronic.

Cashier: The price is still $29.95

M: No, the price is $33.65. You say it’s $29.95 to make people think it’s cheaper. It’s a mean trick. And who pays over $30 for a touque anyway. Keep it.

Morten vs. the Love Child

Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

You know how when the newspaper says something like “Stripper has love child with [insert name of politician / actor here]“? If we are to accept this statement as a valid societal comment we should now all classify children based on the emotional and/or relationalstate of the parents at the time of conception.  Here are some suggestions:

  • drunk child
  • watching tv child
  • not really all that into it child
  • miserable child
  • guilt child
  • makeup child
  • just for fun child
  • hate child 
  • dare child
  • went too far child
  • first date child
  • new job child
  • lost my job child

and of course

  • Valentine’s child

Divers vs. Google StreetView

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

StreetView Driver: Dum dee dum…. and turn left on Rugdeveien… HOLY SHIT I’M BEING CHASED BY TWO GUYS IN FULL DIVING GEAR!

googleDivers3

Image from Google StreetView

All images from Google StreetView on Rugdeveien in Bergen, Norway.

Morten vs. The Hairdresser

Friday, February 5th, 2010

H: Let me put some product in your hair.

M: I don’t think that’s a good idea. My hair is weird and normal gels and pastes make it look oily and dirty. Or I end up looking like a 16 year old with a porcupine on his head. I’m 31. Not a good message to send.

H: It’s OK. I have a wax that will work really well.

M: I doubt it. Last time someone put wax in my hair it looked like I had a pile of straw on my head. I’ll probably have to go home and wash it out immediately to avoid public ridicule.

H: I’m sure it’ll work.

Morten + wax = straw hair

Morten + wax = straw hair